As Kenya revises its Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASP) Bill following public outcry and opaque lobbying efforts, a deeper concern comeS into focus: regulatory capture.
What’s unfolding in Nairobi is not just about one country’s approach to crypto – it’s about the credibility, trust, and growth of the entire East African digital economy.
Kenya’s influence in the region is undeniable. But when its regulatory processes become compromised, the ripple effects are regional.
“Virtual assets are inherently international and borderless, meaning a failure to regulate VASPs in one jurisdiction can have serious global implications.
Terrorist groups are known to be increasingly using virtual assets to raise and move funds globally.” – @FATFNews https://t.co/lbg5xlj4zM
— BitKE (@BitcoinKE) July 2, 2025
Kenya’s Crypto Policy Sets the Tone for East Africa
As East Africa’s fintech powerhouse, Kenya often serves as a model for neighboring countries. Its stance on digital assets, licensing frameworks, and innovation policy informs how Uganda, Tanzania, Rwanda, and others approach their own fintech ecosystems.
This was well demonstrated when claims of the Kenya crypto regulation involved similar captures for markets like Rwanda following the successes in Kenya.
The post claims the Chamber was paid $6,000 per month per country to commit to strategic advocacy, regulatory engagement, and the drafting of model frameworks, all while providing @binance with regular updates and influence over key activities. https://t.co/lvawJ4InQB
— BitKE (@BitcoinKE) June 27, 2025
But recent developments – including the rushed passage of Kenya’s VASP Bill, lack of public consultations, and reports of regulatory lobbying by entrenched interests – paint a troubling picture. When policy becomes a tool for protecting incumbents rather than enabling innovation, the entire region risks copying a broken model.
Investor Confidence Is Regional – and Now at Risk
Crypto and fintech investors increasingly view East Africa as a connected market. If Kenya – the gateway for capital and startups – is seen as unpredictable, captured, or prone to policy backtracking, it casts doubt on the whole region.
The recent outcry over the VASP Bill’s lack of transparency has already raised red flags. Institutional investors watch these signals. When regulations can be shaped behind closed doors, it creates a risk premium across the EAC bloc, diverting funds to jurisdictions with more transparent frameworks like South Africa or Mauritius.
🚨 The Kenya🇰🇪 govt just hit pause on the flawed VASP Bill after public outcry.
The bill risked regulatory capture, weak AML safeguards & unchecked influence by private actors.https://t.co/tHDj3nFoc3#CryptoKE #RegulateRight #AntiCorruption #VASPBill #AML #CryptoRegulation pic.twitter.com/CeQJIIjGmL
— BitKE (@BitcoinKE) July 3, 2025
Innovation Suffers Across Borders
Kenya is a leader in cross-border payments, remittances, and regional fintech expansion. But if crypto regulation becomes a gatekeeping tool – influenced by legacy banks or political actors – regional startups will suffer.
Licensing regimes and compliance costs shaped by capture don’t just hurt Kenyan companies; they make it harder for Rwandan, Ugandan, or Tanzanian fintechs to plug into the Kenyan market – ultimately slowing regional growth and financial inclusion.
Weak Enforcement in Kenya Spills Over
Effective crypto oversight requires cross-border cooperation – on anti-money laundering, fraud detection, and illicit finance. But if Kenya’s institutions are compromised, enforcement credibility takes a hit.
Captured regulation often leads to selective enforcement: favoring insiders while exposing others to regulatory risk. That weakens Kenya’s ability to work with regional and global counterparts on issues like FATF compliance, further damaging East Africa’s collective integrity.
According to the post:
“Several crypto players have claimed that VAC’s claim to wider industry representation is suspect and they fear that when it holds the regulatory reins, it will skew the rules in favor of its clients.”@MzalendoWatch @KeTreasury @circle @kenyanwalstreet https://t.co/lvawJ4InQB
— BitKE (@BitcoinKE) June 27, 2025
EAC Integration Depends on Trust
The East African Community has ambitious digital goals – from harmonized crypto frameworks to unified payment systems. But integration depends on transparency and shared governance values.
Without regional cooperation, firms can engage in anti-competitive practices like cross-border cartels or abuse of dominance in multiple markets.
Read more: https://t.co/OnmFUamYiQ pic.twitter.com/RdVaZvmB5j
— Competition Authority of Kenya (@CAK_Kenya) June 2, 2025
If Kenya continues down a path of opaque regulatory processes shaped by powerful lobbies, it undermines the EAC’s trust architecture, slows down digital identity rollouts, and fractures capital market unification efforts.
Stay tuned to BitKE for deeper insights into the evolving Kenyan and African regulatory crypto space.
Join our WhatsApp channel here.
Follow us on X for the latest posts and updates
________________________________________________
